Get free email updates as I write new articles (no more than once a week):

The Nightline Debate: Proving the Existence of God

Last night, millions watched the debate between Kelly and Brian Sabient (representing atheism) and Ray Comfort and Kirk Cameron (attempting to prove God’s existence without using faith or the Bible). I have reviewed as much of the video as I can stand and have come to some interesting conclusions.

At first, I was disappointed in Ray’s use of Scripture in his opening comments. He had made a commitment to prove God’s existence without the Bible and then proceeded to use the Bible, handing ammunition to his enemies who took full advantage of the moment and exploited his mistake. After much thought and prayer about the matter, I’ve come to the conclusion that Ray had not choice but to use Scripture.

This was his chance to speak to millions of “on the fence” people who might not otherwise have the opportunity to hear the gospel. Further, Ray believes that the Word of God has the supernatural ability to pierce through the hardness of the human heart. And finally, Christianity has made the mistake before of attempting to prove God’s existence without the Bible and our attempts at doing so have failed to convert people or change our surroundings. A convincing argument for a Creator might be fabricated from the witness of nature, but a converting faith is only borne on the wings of God’s inspired revelation of Himself to mankind. What was Ray’s mistake? It was in agreeing not to refer to faith or the Bible to begin with.

The reason I could not stand to watch the entire debate online, stopping the stream early instead, was because of the knot that formed in my stomach as I listened to Kelly blaspheme God in such an extreme way. My heart breaks for her. It is apparent to all who watched that atheism leads to intellectual arrogance and belligerence toward Christians. This rebellious attitude is not only proof of the fall of mankind into sin, left unchecked it always leads to the ultimate end of a soul unable to repent because of the hardening of the heart through the deceitfulness of sin. Should Kelly continue choosing to blaspheme God, she will inevitably push her will beyond the point of ever humbling herself before her Creator. She expressed that she’d rather go to hell than to live in eternity with a God she perceives as unfairly violent toward sinners. I hope this isn’t a self-fulfilling prophecy for her.

The thought that terrifies me the most is that they have become preachers of a false gospel. It isn’t that they question a Creator, it’s that they persuade others to purposely break the command not to blaspheme the Holy Spirit (a misinterpretation of Jesus’ intent, by the way). I’ve encountered the writings of Richard Dawkins and other such rationalists who purport that Christians are guilty of indoctrinating generations of people into believing in a warmonger-god. Yet the skeptics themselves are actively and intentionally recruiting followers to join them in their hate-filled, angry tirade against the very God who bought them with the price of His own dear Son.

At the end of the day, there will be millions who simply will not believe the gospel record. This is nothing new and we cannot naively assume that we’ll ever rid the world of atheism or agnosticism by simply arguing science or Scripture alone. What does seem to be new is the intensity with which atheism belittles people of faith. It is as though the battle lines are being drawn more clearly. The forces of light and darkness are engaged in a more intense form of warfare than at any other time in the recent past. Perhaps we’re moving toward a climax.

Perhaps it is that the day is soon coming when men will make their final choices concerning God and His Son. Should you accept the record of the Bible as inspired and inerrant, as I do, then you’ll discover that the Bible itself predicts the rising intensity of this debate toward the ultimate battle between Jesus and the forces of darkness. Thankfully, we who believe, already have the rest of the story laid out before us, and… Jesus wins!

Share on Facebook and Add a Comment

Or join the conversation by leaving a comment below...


  1. Athiests do not hate God. Athiests believe that there is no higher power, so hating a God wouldn’t make any sense. I am a proud christian and to be honest a lot of the time I see why a lot of athiests might be enraged. I have seen way to many christians (or any religious people) who use God as this religious wheelchair rather than truly thinking for themselves. which in my opinion can lead to a lot of ignorance. Many are blind to what is actually around them, they would rather try to explain it with ancient scripture. I know better than trying to explain religion to an athiest. It is something that a person needs to find for themself.. if that is what they want. christians need to realise that they are believing on blind faith.. which is fine, but are just as wrong as athiests if they want to deam it as the truth.

  2. ingodidoubt says:

    You do not really understand what being an atheist means. It means to see things as they really are and not believing in something that cannot be proven. I cannot say with 100% absolute certainty that there is no god. However, I can say with a high degree of certainty, that I simply see no evidence for one. No evidence, no reason to believe in it.

    • Thanks for weighing in and I appreciate your honesty about that. It raises an important issue – the issue of a "reason to believe." Let me ask you this… is evidence the only reason to believe? Or could other factors be important also? In other words, are you an atheist solely on the basis of a lack of natural evidence in spite of what other factors may exist? It's an interesting question.

Join the Conversation - Leave a Comment


Show us a link to your most recent blog post.